|
What
are they and what are they for?
People
with allergies - to house dust, say, or cats or grass
pollens - make antibodies to these things in their blood.
These are known as IgE antibodies. Thus, people with hayfever
will have special IgE antibodies to grass pollens, those
with cat allergy will have antibodies to cat allergens
etc.
Quite
a lot of people without obvious allergies also make these
antibodies.
People
who make such antibodies - about 35% of the British population
- are described as 'atopic'. Remember, making antibodies
of itself is not a disease or illness. It is only a problem
if there is an allergy with it.
You
can measure these antibodies in blood samples - or by
using a technique called skin prick testing. In these
tests, a small drop of allergen solution is put on the
skin of the forearm and pricked through using a very fine
point. If the person has antibodies to the allergen then
a small, itchy bump will appear over about ten minutes.
It feels exactly like a nettle sting and goes away just
as quickly. If the person has no antibodies then there
will be no bump.
These
tests are very safe. They have been done on millions of
children and adults around the world without causing any
problems. If you don't have antibodies then skin prick
tests will not make you produce them - even if you have
lots of tests.
What did we do in Ashford?
Children
don't start to make IgE antibodies to dust allergens in
the air until they are about 4-5 years old. We didn't
do the first skin prick tests in Ashford until the children
were aged 5-6. We did most of the tests at school - using
drops of house dust mite, cat and grass pollen allergens.
Almost all the children were very brave about this - although
we had a few tears!
We
also tested their parents! This was to find out whether
they were 'atopic' - because we know that allergies and
atopy tend to run in families.
What
did we find in Ashford?
About
a third of the Ashford parents had one or more positive
responses to the skin tests. Men were slightly more likely
to do so than women.
Many
fewer children had a positive responses - this is as we
would expect since they are of course much younger.
|
About
one third of mothers and fathers had a positive
skin prick test - but only one in six of the
five year olds
|
| percentage
of mothers, fathers or children |
|
|
|
|
|
Children
were about equally likely to have a positive test to cat
fur as to grass pollen or house dust mite.
|
At
the age of five, about 10% of the Ashford study
children had a positive skin prick test to cat
or grass or house dust mite
|
| percentage
of Ashford study children with a positive test |
|
|
|
skin
prick test solution
|
|
go
to the top
|